The Odds of an Evil God & The Truth of Moral Questions

January 15, 2013
By

Stephen Law

Stephen Law

Stephen Law Discusses His Interesting Thoughts on Morality, His “Evil God Hypothesis,” and His Views on Religion

Philosopher Stephen Law challenges theists to explain, “. . . why the hypothesis that there exists an omnipotent, omniscient and all-good god should be considered significantly more reasonable than the hypothesis that there exists an omnipotent, omniscient and all-evil god. Theists typically dismiss the evil god hypothesis out of hand because of the problem of good – there is surely too much good in the world for it to be the creation of such a being. But then why doesn’t the problem of evil provide equally good grounds for dismissing belief in a good god?” Law is the editor of the Royal Institute of Philosophy journal THINK. He has published several books and is senior lecturer in philosophy at Heythrop College, University of London. His books include Believing Bullshit, The Philosophy Gym, Humanism, A Very Short Introduction, and The War for Children’s Minds. During our conversation, Law shares his interesting views on morality, discusses how science relates to morality, and challenges both theists and non-theists to think.

MP3 File
(42 minutes, 17 seconds, 20.3 MB)

Tags: , , , , , ,

5 Responses to The Odds of an Evil God & The Truth of Moral Questions

  1. greg balteff
    January 20, 2013 at 9:30 am

    al, enjoyed your podcast with stephen law.Please keep up the great work and have stephen law and peter boghossian on your show more often.

  2. Sculler
    January 17, 2013 at 9:13 pm

    Ditto.

  3. Trent
    January 17, 2013 at 2:02 pm

    Fantastic podcast! Thanks for

    • R Singh
      January 17, 2013 at 5:06 pm

      I 2nd it.

Add Comment Register



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow The MG

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • RSS Feed for Posts

The MG on Twitter